Perspective Operator perspective
Build In-House or Partner? What to Weigh Before You Decide
There's no right answer to the build-or-partner question, but four things should shape it: the real cost, your ability to scale, how much control you need, and whether the choice will last.
Every operator hits the same fork sooner or later: build it in-house, or partner with a supplier. It happens with proptech and with outsourced service areas alike, and the decision points never run out.
I faced it many times as an operator, then watched others face it while I ran a shared services company. Having held both perspectives, I don't believe there is a right or a wrong. Here are four considerations that have mattered most to me.
1. The price tag, and why not to stop there
The financial cost of the product or service is the most obvious factor. One option will usually cost more, and sometimes the pricier one is doing it in-house, sometimes it's outsourcing.
But don't stop at the price tag. I have made this mistake. I decided it could be cheaper to do something in-house, and later realized I had been paying for far more than the service. I had been paying for outcomes.
Two real examples: when I moved away from Grace Hill, and again from J Turner Research, we found alternatives we could run for less money. In hindsight, I lost the expertise and strategy of those two organizations, not just their output.
The invoice shrank, and so did the insight behind the work.
2. Scale
Most businesses in this industry need to scale up or down regularly. Business is won or lost, assets are divested or acquired, and market conditions shift, so demand for almost any service ebbs and flows.
Ask yourself whether you have a partner, or an internal process, that can absorb that swing in either direction. A team sized for a growth year can be a heavy fixed cost in a contraction, and a lean team can break the moment a portfolio doubles.
3. Who do you trust?
Some things you may simply consider too valuable to outsource. That's fair. No matter how great the partner, you give up some level of control when you outsource, and only you can decide how much of that you're comfortable with.
4. Sustainability
If you build in-house, are you relying on one person and their level of expertise? What happens if they leave?
Conversely, if you outsource, what signals tell you the supplier is going to be around in two years?
Where I've landed
My own lesson has veered toward outsourcing, with the right partner and the right arrangement. The partner matters, and so does how the relationship is structured: what you're buying, how it scales, and who owns the strategy.
Why this directory exists
My hope for StudentHousingSuppliers.com is that you can find those partners and achieve the outcomes you want, not just the output. That frees you to spend your time on the work you're best at, which is likely operating properties and serving residents well.
If you're weighing a build-or-partner decision right now, browse the category that matches it and start a conversation.
Disclosure: The author founded Student Housing Suppliers and previously ran Centricity, a shared services company. He names two suppliers he worked with as an operator; neither had a say in this piece. Reviewed by our editors before publishing. How we publish
Add your perspective
Agree, disagree, or do it differently?
The Playbook is written by people who do this work. Share your own insight or advice on this topic: a quick tip, a lesson learned or a full guide. It's reviewed, credited to you with your photo and company, and easy to share.
Found this useful? Pass it on.
Part of the Asset & Financial Performance chapter of the Student Housing Playbook. Have another approach or a lesson learned? Contribute your experience.
